New Hampshire Family Justice

Since 2005, New Hampshire has operated an oversight-free administrative family court that obviously undermines accountability. Marketed as family-friendly, it functions within the executive branch—relying on paid opinions and overriding law and constitutional rights. While it mimics a judicial process, it sacrifices rights, integrity, and transparency. The court consistently strips parents of their rights and freedom of movement, separating families without proper due process—a violation of the 150-year-old constitutional recognition of movement as a fundamental right, beginning with Paul v. Virginia (1869). Family legal service providers openly collude to fabricate cases, creating meritless long-term processes and child support contracts. The more unnecessary services imposed, the greater the financial gain. Enforcement involves interagency agreements that manipulate a sector of the population, separating parents. The three main family court agencies use severe tactics and rights removal to fulfill fabricated financial contracts, stripping parents and children of guaranteed freedoms without due process.